Friday, August 7, 2009

ANOTHER STORY LINE, THIS TIME OVER BOB OCKERMAN'S SIGNATURE



     Attorney Amy Hughbanks, of the Green County law firm, Jungman and Hughbanks, P.C. with offices in Van Meter, agreed to represent me in the case and on June 3, 2008 addressed her letter of inquiry regarding my homestead E-911 address.  After three more weeks of Ockerman's silence Ms. Hughbanks followed the letter by telephone with Ockerman.   June 25 she posted to Ockerman a letter of understanding of their telephone conversation and again requested a written reply.  July 9 2008 Ockerman did reply in writing and with that advanced the certainty that his and the Board's real reasons for the E-911 Boards inexplicable behavior  was yet to be revealed.  Following is Ockerman's explanation":



     There several discoveries from this letter:
1. "The assigned number will be plotted by GPS at the center of the primary entrance of the premise."

       What is extremely fishy about this statement is that the E-911 Board had already plotted and addressed Tthis site in 2006 and agaiin in 2009.

2.   "O Avenue does not go South of 260th Street and 260th Street does not exist East of 0 Avenue, his request for 24002 260th Street would not be a good address in the County System."

     This is truly a grasping at desperation, it was the E-911 Board that addressed this very site, "26998 260th St." in December 2006.